Submissions

Author Guidelines

Papers are invited from anywhere in the world, and so authors are asked to ensure that sufficient context is provided for all readers to appreciate their contribution.

The Types of papers
The types of papers that may be considered for inclusion are:
1)   Original research;
2)   Short communications and;
3)   Review papers, which include meta-analysis and systematic review

Kindly please download the template in MS Word file format or LATEX version. Use the guide of authors as template and your guideline for preparing your papers.

• Manuscripts should also be spellchecked by the facility available in most good word-processing packages.
• Extensive use of italics and emboldening within the text should be avoided.
• Papers should be clear, precise and logical and should not normally exceed 5,000 words.
• The Abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory, provide a clear statement of the problem, the proposed approach or solution, and point out major findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be 150 to 200 words in length. The abstract should be written in the past tense.
• The keyword list provides the opportunity to add keywords, used by the indexing and abstracting services, in addition to those already present in the title. Judicious use of keywords may increase the ease with which interested parties can locate our article.
• The Introduction should provide a clear background, a clear statement of the problem, the relevant literature on the subject, the proposed approach or solution, and the new value of research which it is innovation. It should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific disciplines.
• Explaining research chronological, including research design and research procedure. The description of the course of research should be supported references, so the explanation can be accepted scientifically.
• Tables and Figures are presented center.
• In the results and discussion section should be explained the results and at the same time is given the comprehensive discussion.
• A good conclusion should provide a statement that what is expected, as stated in the "Introduction" section can ultimately result in "Results and Discussion" section, so there is compatibility. Moreover, it can also be added the prospect of the development of research results and application prospects of further studies into the next (based on the results and discussion).
• Each citation should be written in the order of appearance in the text in square brackets. For example, the first citation [1], the second citation [2], and the third and fourth citations [3,4]. When citing multiple sources at once, the preferred method is to list each number separately, in its own brackets, using a comma or dash between numbers, as such: [1], [3], [5] or [4-8]. It is not necessary to mention an author's name, pages used, or date of publication in the in-text citation. Instead, refer to the source with a number in a square bracket, e.g. [9], that will then correspond to the full citation in your reference list. Examples of in-text citations:
  
  • This theory was first put forward in 1970 [9].
  • Zadeh [10] has argued that...
  • Several recent studies [7], [9], [11-15] have suggested that....
  • ...end of the line for my research [16].

One author should be designated as corresponding author and provide the following information:
• E-mail address
• Full postal address

Please note that any papers which fail to meet our requirements will be returned to the author for amendment. Only papers which are submitted in the correct style will be considered by the Editors.